View the scanned original illustrations
But it still discusses, it wrangles, and, let us add, it tries, in the wreck of its spirit, to bequeathe the essential lesson of that spirit—if not by the language of form which it scarcely knows any longer, at least by words. About the first century the whole civilization of antiquity concentrates around Alexandria, as if to take an inventory of its conquests. The Egyptian, in his weariness, is at the back of the stage, but the Jew and the Greek stand before the audience, applauded or hooted, friends or enemies. Now alone, now followed by fanatical multitudes, they work in the fever, the trepidation, and the clamor of a ceaselessly jostling and renewed cosmopolitanism. On a bed of abject vices, of intensified asceticisms, among uncompromising mystics and indulgent skeptics, the idea ferments. Philosophers, critics, romancers, theologians, rhetoricians, artists—this whole world mingles together and shouts. The artist goes in for theology, the philosopher for romances, the theologian for criticism, the romancer for rhetoric. It is a unique moment in the history of mankind; Egypt contributes its mystery, Greece its reason, Asia its god. And in spite of Egypt, Greece, and Asia, the synthesis of the ancient world, that is to be effected in the too aristocratic domain of the mind by the enthusiasm of the prophets and the subtlety of the sophists, is to pass over the mass of humanity without satisfying the hunger of its needs. The world is wearied with thinking, it tempers its unsettled ideal in its primitive element once more—in the innocence of the people. A new mythology is to triumph over the philosophers, who are preparing its unfolding.
But it still discusses, it wrangles, and, let us add, it tries, in the wreck of its spirit, to bequeathe the essential lesson of that spirit—if not by the language of form which it scarcely knows any longer, at least by words. About the first century the whole civilization of antiquity concentrates around Alexandria, as if to take an inventory of its conquests. The Egyptian, in his weariness, is at the back of the stage, but the Jew and the Greek stand before the audience, applauded or hooted, friends or enemies. Now alone, now followed by fanatical multitudes, they work in the fever, the trepidation, and the clamor of a ceaselessly jostling and renewed cosmopolitanism. On a bed of abject vices, of intensified asceticisms, among uncompromising mystics and indulgent skeptics, the idea ferments. Philosophers, critics, romancers, theologians, rhetoricians, artists—this whole world mingles together and shouts. The artist goes in for theology, the philosopher for romances, the theologian for criticism, the romancer for rhetoric. It is a unique moment in the history of mankind; Egypt contributes its mystery, Greece its reason, Asia its god. And in spite of Egypt, Greece, and Asia, the synthesis of the ancient world, that is to be effected in the too aristocratic domain of the mind by the enthusiasm of the prophets and the subtlety of the sophists, is to pass over the mass of humanity without satisfying the hunger of its needs. The world is wearied with thinking, it tempers its unsettled ideal in its primitive element once more—in the innocence of the people. A new mythology is to triumph over the philosophers, who are preparing its unfolding.
Social
surroundings such as these do not permit belief in a great Alexandrian art,
which would have been lost. Neither strong architecture nor great sculpture
reposes on systems, especially when the systems interpenetrate and vary
incessantly. The source of plastic inspiration had dried up in the too
complicated mind of the upper classes and had not yet appeared in the dark soul
of the people. At Alexandria, as at other places, there were admirable
renewals, spiritual leaps as straight as those of a dying flame, the gleams of
a deep love. Certain bas-reliefs of Alexandrian, Greco-Latin, or Hellenistic
origin—the matter is of little importance for the same spirit insinuates itself
everywhere—certain bas-reliefs seize upon us through the liveliness and the
grace—the joy rescued from intellectual pessimism, the ardent abandon to the
intoxication of enjoyment through understanding, and of understanding through
enjoyment. The fruit of the vineyard is ripe, the vintagers gather it, to the
sound of flute and cymbals; they dance on the grapes. A long, long winter may
come. The round of the dancers grows wilder, the hair of the women streams,
their heaving bosoms and their legs are bared, the panthers creep through the
shadows to lick up the blood that Is to flow. But this epoch, in which Egyptian
hieratism often comes to tempt the dying inspiration of the Greek, cultivates
"genre" sculpture, which is the unmistakable mark, on the dust of the
centuries, of baseness and vulgarity of mind. These sculptors surprise the
questionable professions in their picturesque adventures; they tell little
stories that make you laugh or cry. It Is the Japanese bibelot, done with far
less skill, or the clock-top of the lower middle classes of our century with
far more skill and not much more wit. The greater part of the bas-reliefs
exhibit the same tendencies, the often confused and overloaded anecdote, and a
background of landscape as its setting. They show how sculpture was corrupted
in the Ptolemaic periods by the studies and method of painters. And that is the
most serious of the social indications that can be found in this art.
This
need of fusing the two great modes of plastic evocation had been appearing in
Greece itself for at least three centuries. Praxiteles looked on form as a
painter rather than as a sculptor; Lysippus, also, at times, and the sculptor
of the "Tomb of Alexander," and especially the decorator of Pergamos.
The great classic sculpture had indeed made use of painting, but as an
accessory means, to give to the form, already living through its own structure,
the superficial appearance of life. Under the broad, simple tones which covered
the decorative ensembles and remained tranquil in the light, the sculptural
plane persisted. On the contrary, in the fourth century, and very much more in
the Hellenistic periods, pictorial expression tends to get along without form
and to model the surfaces by the mysterious play of the lights, the shadows,
the half-tones, and the diffused envelope of the air. It is still a legitimate
process when it is practiced on bas-relief, but it is fatal to sculpture. Form
must live in space by its own means, like the living being. The planes
determined by its inner life are the exact criterion of the statue's success or
failure in its contact with the outside atmosphere. An envelope is necessary
only to the painter, since he transfers conventionally, to a flat surface, the
materiality and the depth of space. If the sculptor incorporates an artificial
atmosphere with form, the real atmosphere will devour it.
In the
epoch of Alexandria the confusion is complete. The mystics of Asia and the
skeptics of Europe, wearied by their skepticism, need the vague envelope that
destroys form and opens dreams as vague as itself. The great sculpture of
Egypt, even while retaining its strong traditions, had already, in the Saite
epoch, headed for these cloudy horizons. The anecdote surrounded by the mystery
of painting, indeed the whole of Greek art from Praxiteles onward, tends toward
them. Grandeur of sentiment having disappeared, sentimentalism, a new thing,
was bound to germinate in the pain of the masses and the indecision of the
intellectuals, to renew the energy of the world. It is only in these tendencies
that we can find in Alexandrian art an attempt, even if an obscure one, to fuse
the essential aspirations of the ideals of the ancient world.
The
ideal of the Jew is justice. It is a limited and exclusive ideal, and, for that
reason, uncompromising and hard. Like every excess of passion, the passion for
justice, when it has no counterpoise, renders man unjust toward those who do
not think as he does, and unjust toward himself, for his thought knows no other
refuge than daily sacrifice and pitiless severity. He is unhappy and alone, for
he is unacquainted with forgiveness. The ideal of the Greek is wisdom, the
order of the world obeyed and disciplined by the intelligence, the conquest—patient
and undivorced from life—of a relative equilibrium. He has a strong feeling for
what is just, but what is beautiful and what is true is to the same degree the
object qf his passion. He finds in each of these ideas the echoes of the other
two, and completes, tempers, and broadens each one through the others. Phidias
is in Pythagoras, and Socrates is in Phidias.
The
Jews were bound to misunderstand Christ because he reacted as an artist against
the ideal of justice which had made them unjust, and taught the lowly to pity
the strong. The Greeks were far better prepared to understand Him. They knew
Him from long ago. He was Dionysus, come from India and returning through Asia
with the armies of Alexander; Dionysus the god of periodic resurrections, the
god of primitive superstitions, of magics and sorceries, as he had been, in the
time of Aeschylus, the god of pagan drunkenness; Dionysus, the eternal god of
the multitudes and of women. He was the God-man of their myths also, the hero,
Herakles, Prometheus. Before Christ the Stoics had taught the conquest of the
inner freedom, which is the measure of the discipline which we can impose on
ourselves. Before Christ Socrates had died for man. The humanity of Christ was
the testament of the ancient world rather than the preface to the new.
First
it brought the sword. St. Paul was to betray Jesus and whisper into the
darkened intelligence of the moaning world the revenge of the Jewish mind. The
philosophers were to turn their backs on Him, but the suffering slaves and the
women, of whom our mind as well as our flesh is born, the women forever
watching that the fire may burn on the hearth—the slaves and the women hearken
to Him. Man creates the ideal, but he tires of it. When the ideal burns out in
him it is woman who picks it up to let it sleep in her until another male voice
comes to awaken it there. If art is feminized and softened in the mind of men,
as all the works of this age testify, the will becomes virile and tense in the
heart of women. And it is the latter development which kills the former.
Reason
was dying alone, skeptical and disdainful. Sentiment was growing up alone,
blind and groping. It was to conquer. It was the crowd and it was life.
The
sentimental uprising of the weak ruins civilization. We are about to burn the
books, smash the statues, gut the human temples, and lose our contact with the
earth. What does it matter? We must accept these downfalls. It is they that are
the condition of the morrow which makes reparation. On the western soil, plowed
by Greece, the real thought of Christ is to be reborn in the speech of
Prometheus, after more than a thousand years of darkness, furies, and
misunderstanding. Perhaps it is this abyss that is contemplated by the old
portraits of the last Egypt, with their faces of enigma and their shadowy eyes
in which a light trembles.
No comments:
Post a Comment