ART
history is, in its essentials, the history of man, for no one can write the
story of art in more than a superficial way without following out the relation
of each school to the ideas of its period and its people. But it is even more
than that: it is the history of the development of man as revealed by his art.
Élie Faure, in the present history, pursues this idea with a fidelity and an
understanding that it has never received till now. Indeed, one may almost say
that such a work as this could not have been written earlier, for it has been
only gradually that we have come to understand the relation of art to the
character and surroundings of the races it represents. Various works on
isolated artists and schools have dealt with their subject from this standpoint,
but there existed no survey of the world's art as a whole until the four
volumes of this series were written.
The
professional, whether critic, teacher, or artist, will find in these pages the
fullest application of the modern theory of history (for the governing idea
here is one that goes beyond the limits of art history), while the layman will
follow the epic of man's development in company with a passionate lover of
beauty who has the gift of communicating his enthusiasm. It is a fallacy to believe
that a book for the general reader should dilute the ideas of works addressed
to specialists. The contrary is true: to meet the needs of persons of diverse
interests, more intensity of idea is required, more breadth of scope, than is
demanded of a treatise for specialists, whose concern with their subject will
cause them to overlook dryness and diffuseness if a valuable theory is
established or new facts are arrived at.
For a
comparison of the older and the newer views of art history, the reader can scarcely
be referred to anything clearer than M. Faure's own discussion in the preface
to the new edition of this work. His brief reference there to the synoptic
tables at the back of each volume may be supplemented by the assurances
received from various close students of the special schools and epochs, who
agree in vouching for the thoroughness with which this most objective
compilation of names and dates has been made. A reference chart is thus
constantly before the reader, serving him as a road map does a traveler. The
text of most art histories does little more than amplify such tables. The
characteristic which distinguishes Élie Faure's History of Art is that it shows the mass of facts functionally—as
the living brain and heart of mankind.
The
loyalty with which, in the preface mentioned, M. Faure defends the work of the
archaeologist is due in part to his appreciation of the material that the
searchers for detail have placed at his disposal, but doubtless in part also to
the fact that he himself knows the labor of obtaining the first-hand
information on which the history and interpretation of art are built. At no one
place, however (and one need not fear to lay too much stress on this point),
does he fall into the error of imagining that an assembling of facts is
history. Even when writing of arts like the Egyptian and the Greek, as to which
his study on the historic sites has given him a special authority, even when
treating of the Gothic period, as to which his knowledge is so profound as to
make Mr. Havelock Ellis apply the word "unsurpassable" to the
chapters of this history on Gothic art—his modern understanding of his task
causes him to refer constantly to the philosophy, social life, and ideals of
the people under examination, and not to their art alone. He goes farther, and
by a series of dramatic confrontations makes us realize the differences among
the arts and their debt to one another. Thus, in the pages on the Gothic he has
before his eyes the color of Mohammedan art which was of such importance to
western Europe when its returning crusaders brought back to the glassmakers of
the cathedrals their memories of the Orient. Yet M. Faure's main guide in this
part of his study is the life of the mediaeval commune; he shows its relation
to the appearance or nonappearance of great cathedrals in the French cities and
its use as a basis for an explanation of the difference between English and
French Gothic. We are thus relieved in very large measure from the tyranny of
taste and of arbitrary assertion that plays so large a part in most art
writing.
In the
present volume, again, the rise and decline of Greek art are not treated as
matters that have been permanently decided by experts; neither does the author
justify his statements in terms of aesthetics to be followed only by those
persons who have had a special experience in the arts. The sources of Greek art
are studied with a view of allowing anyone interested in the subject to see the
reason for the "focus" that would be produced when the elements of
the light were fused, the golden period is considered with relation to the
ideas of philosophy and liberty which had so great an effect on the arts, and
as Greece turns to the Dusk of Mankind (with which variant of Wagner's word
"Gotterdammerung" M. Faure entitles his chapter on the decline), we
are again shown, in the ideas at work in the race, the reasons for the new
phases of its art—and not simply told that one statue is later or worse than
another, or involved in technical intricacies from which we only escape with
the classic "de gustibus.''
A
feature of the history, which, the English reader will recognize with the four
volumes before him, is the scope of the work. It is one of the proofs of its
right to represent the modern idea of art. Beginning with the accessions to our
knowledge a century ago, when important Greek works came to northern Europe, we
have for a hundred years been extending the boundaries of the art considered
classic. The masterpieces of Japan, China, and India have been reaching us only
since the middle of the nineteenth century. The last of the exotic arts to
affect Europeans has been that of the African sculptors. No other history
approaches that of M. Faure in its full and clear study of the contribution of
these more lately recognized arts to the widening of our horizon and to the
changes in our understanding which they have caused.
It is
not alone that the art of the last half century is different from that of
earlier times because it is built on a wider base, but that to-day we see the
whole of the past with new eyes. As our thought evolves there will
unquestionably be further changes in our estimate of the past, but the summary
resulting from the present work may confidently be expected to hold its rank as
an important one in the history of the subject. For we have here the ideas of a
period of intense research and criticism, and a point in that period when our
thought has attained at least a temporary tranquility through its grasp of the
new elements at its command and through an outlook on art that represents the
creative men of the epoch.
It is
to be doubted whether later critics will differ, to a radical degree, from the
judgment of the Renaissance to which M. Faure points in his volume on that
period, for the great critical activity of the last half century has been
specially occupied with the Renaissance, and M. Faure knows well the results of
this study. Perhaps it will be around the volume on Modern Art that later discussion will mainly center, for here the
currents of interpretation sometimes issue from conflicting sources. M. Faure's
analysis, however, must have a permanent interest, for it is based on too deep
an understanding of the political and social structure of the European
countries ever to be entirely superseded. It is the philosophy of a man whose
role in the drama of his time is enriched by the great breadth of his
activities and who has drawn on them all in his writing on art—the central
interest of his career.
Élie
Faure is a physician, and the scientist's knowledge and point of view is to be
traced in his History of Art as well
as in his masterly essay on Lamarck. He is one of the founders of the
L’université
Populaire and one of its lecturers. The thought on social questions which
informs those books by M. Faure that treat of economic and racial evolution, of
ethics and of war, recurs when he writes of art, or rather he looks on all of
these things as inextricably mingled.
As we
reach his pages on the later nineteenth century and the twentieth (for the last
volume carries us to the art produced since the war), we find the author giving
not only the original judgments that characterize his history from its
beginning, but transmitting to us the ideas of the artists themselves, for as a
result of his personal acquaintance with many of the chief workers of his time,
he is enabled to speak not only of them but for them.
And yet
the tone of these pages is but little different from that of the remainder of
the work; the arts of the past have been so alive for the writer that his words
seem to come most often from one who had seen the work produced. While
searching untiringly for the facts of history and presenting their essentials
in the order and relationship that the most modern scholarship has made
available, the idea behind the whole work must (as M. Faure himself explains in
the preface to the new edition before cited) be tinged with the personality of
the writer and by the character of his time. "The historian who calls
himself a scientist simply utters a piece of folly." In these matters
judgment is inevitable, for to write the history of art one must make one's
decisions as to what it is. The writing of it is in itself a work of art—as the
style of Élie
Faure is there to prove. Only one who feels the emotions of art can tell others
which are the great works and make clear the collective poem formed by their
history. It is precisely because Élie Faure is adding something
to that poem that he has the right to tell us of its meaning.
Walter
Pach
No comments:
Post a Comment